For more than a week the internet has been inundated with award show drama. During the 93rd Academy ceremony, comedian Chris Rock lightheartedly joked about Jaida Smith’s shaved head being reminiscent of G.I. Jane. Her husband Will angrily marched on stage and violently slapped the host. Viewers are torn on the authenticity of this televised episode. Some insist the assault was genuine while others believe it’s merely a staged performance to boost formerly plummeting ratings. However, what cannot be debated is the ensuing media frenzy. Seemingly overnight there is constant discussion and rampant news coverage of a particular autoimmune disease called alopecia areata. The headlining actress suffers from this condition which causes hair loss. In an interesting twist, Oscars-sponsor Pfizer just so happens to be finalizing a new drug that treats—you guessed it: alopecia.
Brought to You by Big Pharma
Hollywood has a dark track record filled with unbridled pedophilia, ritualistic abuse, and pushing an insidious agenda. Amid the pandemic-era celebrities have become Big Pharma’s most outspoken proponents. Pfizer and Eli Lilly representatives recently paid millions of dollars to broadcast the annual star-studded gala. Simultaneously, the multinational biotechnology company is completing Phase 3 clinical trials using a rheumatoid arthritis medication to treat alopecia. Baricitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is said to be effective in combating the disfiguring skin ailment. Soon these patented cytokine-restricting pills will be presented to the Federal Food & Drug Administration for additional review and approval. Cue the Oscars’ supposedly ‘random’ attention-grabbing incident. What better marketing campaign than bombarding potential consumers with information about the disorder your product claims to cure?
Billions of people worldwide have been injected with the experimental coronavirus vaccine. Despite an alarming spike in overall deaths since its rollout, countless citizens are eagerly lining up for the latest booster. With each passing day, debilitating health complications continue to surmount. In 2021 alone the VAERS database collected more than 914,000 adverse reactions. Yet inoculated individuals are not the only ones suffering from jab-related consequences. Thousands of the unvaccinated experience side effects after being in close proximity to mRNA recipients. Some call the transfer of genetic substances ‘shedding’ while skeptics insist such claims are delusional conspiracy theories. However, Pfizer’s official medical papers define the phenomenon and issue a warning to staff members.
Pfizer’s Shedding Protocol
In November of 2020, a document was released titled “A PHASE 1/2/3, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND, DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF SARS-COV-2 RNA VACCINE CANDIDATES AGAINST COVID-19 IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS”. Throughout the publication, there are sections concerning viral transmissions to unimmunized workers. Beginning on page 67, the pharmaceutical company details its strict occupational exposure protocol. Employees must alert an administrator of any associated secondary adverse events (SAE) within 24 hours. Here are some critical statements covered in the manual:
Contraction can result via skin contact or inhalation of molecular particles naturally expelled by the body.
Those at the greatest risk for ensuing side effects include healthcare providers, family members, and caretaker-type roles.
Breastfeeding women must file a report upon unplanned contact with clinical subjects irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred due to potential dangers to newborns.
If a recently pregnant female encounters a trial participant, she must immediately alert the safety department as messenger RNA can jeopardize the baby’s development or cause a miscarriage.